English 11 American Literature Unit 3 Short Story Essay Example

English 11 American Literature Unit 3 Short Story Paper short story an imaginative prose narrative written to give the reader entertainment and insight; intended to be read in one sitting plot what happens in a story characters those who make the plot happen theme the meaning of the story tone/mood the attitude or emotion of the author or narrator toward his subject or audience point of view the method of presenting teh reader with the materials of the story; the perspective from which it is told. omniscient point of view an all-knowing author is the narrator who comments freely on the actions and characters as he is able to delve into the minds of all characters and tell what they think or feel limited point of view the author tells teh story from the viewpoint of one character using either the first or third person objectve point of view the author presents the characters in actions with no comment, allowing the reader to come to his own conclusions about them irony a method of expression in which the intended meaning of the words used is the direct opposite of their usual sense; used for humor or sarcasm verbal irony saying the opposite of what is meant dramatic irony contrasting what a character says and what a reader or audience knows to be true situational irony presenting a discrepancy between appearance and reality or between expectation and fulfillment satire the ridicule of human folly or vice with the purpose of correcting it or for a humorous effect surprise ending the unexpected twist at the end of the story which goes contrary to the readers expectations conflict the central source of tension and drama that makes stories interesting man vs man conflict between people man vs society conflict between an individual and larger groups man vs nature conflict between an individual adn the natural world man vs self conflict within a character with themselves man vs fate conflict with what seems to be an uncontrollable problem such as destiny man vs technology conflict with the forces of man-made technology external conflict a struggle between a character and an outside force internal conflict a struggle that takes place in the characters mind direct characterization the author tells the reader about the characters directly indirect characterization the author shows the character in action and lets the reader make their interpretations protagonist the main character antagonist the character or force in conflict setting where and when the story takes place

Summary of Children Need to Play, Not Compete

Summary of Children Need to Play, Not Compete In Children Need to Play, Not Compete, Jessica Statsky argues that organized sports are not suitable for children between the ages of six and twelve and should, therefore, be replaced by sports that emphasize on fitness, cooperation, and sportsmanship. Statsky claims that highly organized sports such as Peewee Football and Little League Baseball are played according to adult standards with undesirable effects on the development of children. She goes on to state that the physical action that is necessitated by overly competitive sports exposes children to danger through injury. The danger to children is not only limited to physical injury as Statsky asserts that competitive sports pose psychological dangers to children.† The author claims that the games are counterproductive to children and they only serve to provide occasions for parents and coaches to fulfill their fantasies and needs. She reveals that the obsession with winning leads to adults degrading the quality of the pla ying experience for children. Statsky provides examples of incidents where brawls have broken out between adults as a result of completion. Statsky concludes by proposing that local programs which emphasize sportsmanship, cooperation and fitness should replace the overly competitive programs currently in place. (197 Words).Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Summary of Children Need to Play, Not Compete specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Response to Children Need to Play I strongly agree with Jessica Statskys article Children Need to Play, Not Compete. As a person who underwent a childhood in which I was exposed to competitive sports, I agree with Statsky’s proposal that the high competition in children sports should be done away. I agree with the authors observation that the competitive nature of the games takes the fun element out. From my childhood experiences, sports were always more fun when they were un dertaken in a spirit of cooperation and friendliness. When winning became the dominant factor, everything changed, and the game could no longer be played in a fun atmosphere. In my opinion, a significant strength that the author demonstrates through her article is that she uses words that are vivid in her descriptions. For example, her portrayal of the scene where the player in the Peewee Football game takes himself out of the game by faking a stomach ache is very moving. By such vivid descriptions, the reader can paint a mental image of the negative effect that excessive competition can have. Statsky’s treatment of the subject is balanced, and the arguments expressed by the author are not restricted to the side she supports but also the opposition. Statsky does not shy away from presenting the opinion of the proponents of competitive sports for children. She frequently references the Little League Online which is a website that advocates for competitive sports among children . The author especially gives ethical considerations to the other points of view. After stating that children run the risk of physical injury as a result of competitive games, she quotes the proponents of competitive sports activities who document that the injury risks are infrequent. By doing this, Statsky gives us a balanced view on the issue as opposed to only giving space to her point of view. This increases the credibility of the essay to me since the author is not trying to use the ignorance of the reader on the matter to force her point home. The author also makes use of statistics to reinforce her claims, therefore, making them more credible. For example, she asserts that according to a study, â€Å"90% of children would rather play regularly for a losing team rather than warm the bench for a winning team†. Even more importantly, the author includes references as to which studies she is referring to, therefore, increasing the validity of the results since one can conf irm her reporting should they wish to.Advertising Looking for assessment on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More For all the strengths of the article, I find Statsky guilty of using many generalizations which may not necessarily be true for the majority of the population. She states that in instances where children are not injured, fear of being hurt detracts from their enjoyment of the sport. while this may be the case for some or even a majority of the children, it is highly unlikely that it is the case for all the children involved in competitive sports. Statsky’s presents a strong argument, and her case is made especially compelling by the author’s use of authoritative sources to back up her argument. Through this, it is clear that children risk not only physical but also psychological damages as a result of overly competitive programs. I agree with her assertion that this situation should be reversed and less competitive sports programs devised for children to ensure that children have a fun and constructive childhood. Statsky, Jessica. Children Need to Play, Not Compete. Bedford Books. Print.